What does this mean?
Legal teams focus on what changed, speed reviews, and communicate impacts clearly to stakeholders, reducing negotiation cycles and preventing missed edits.
How it works?
Compares two or more contract versions to highlight added, removed, and modified language, then presents a concise side-by-side summary of differences.
Workflow steps
Step 1: Upload contract versions
The Workflow starts with a manual trigger where a team member uploads two or more versions of a contract—such as the original draft and the counterparty's redline—along with any relevant context about the deal.
Step 2: Extract and parse contract language
Cassidy processes each uploaded document, extracting the full text and identifying key sections, clauses, and defined terms across all versions.
Step 3: Compare versions and identify changes
Cassidy analyzes the documents side by side—flagging added language, removed provisions, and modified terms between each version.
Step 4: Categorize and summarize differences
The Workflow organizes changes by type and significance, producing a concise summary that highlights what was added, deleted, or revised—so reviewers can focus on what matters most.
Step 5: Generate side-by-side comparison report
Cassidy compiles the analysis into a clear, formatted summary showing the differences between versions, making it easy to communicate impacts to stakeholders.
Step 6: Export and share results
The final comparison is exported as a Microsoft Word document or sent via email to the legal team and relevant stakeholders, ready for review, negotiation prep, or internal sign-off.